Wind siting reform and local control

Posted on June 16, 2009. Filed under: Wind |

From Wind for Wisconsin:

SB 185/AB 256 would direct the PSC to establish statewide siting standards for wind energy projects. Projects fewer than 100 MW in size would still be reviewed and approved by a local unit of government after the rules are adopted.

+ The status quo is the only approach to wind siting that would leave local control completely unchanged. The status quo has stalled over 600 MW of potential wind projects forfeiting thousands of Wisconsin jobs and millions of investment dollars.
+ The bill draft requires the PSC to establish an advisory committee of diverse interests to advise the Commission on the rules. Representatives from local units of government will be part of that advisory committee.
+ In 2006 the WTA passed a resolution at its annual convention entitled “Uniform Standards for Public Health or Safety of Wind Energy Systems.” The resolution called for uniform standards, and was the impetus for wind siting reform legislation.
+ The bill draft from the previous legislative session was negotiated with the Wisconsin Counties Association and the Wisconsin Towns Association. The WTA was in favor of wind siting reform last session while the WCA was neutral.1 The bill draft for the current legislative session is substantively similar.
+ An amendment from the Wisconsin Realtors Association (supported by Wind for Wisconsin) allows local governments to deny a project application if a project would be sited in an area that has been primarily designated for future residential or commercial development.2
+ Under SB 185/AB 256, local units of government would maintain their central role in the regulatory process for wind energy systems. Applications for wind energy projects under 100 MW in size would still be subject to review and approval at the local level.

Local governments would be responsible for enforcing permit standards. Local governments would maintain control over their roads including restoration requirements and regulating driveway use (access roads).

In the coming weeks, the state Legislature will have a chance to make it easier for clean energy creating wind turbines to proliferate in Wisconsin…Critics likely will charge that the bill is an attack on local control. However, it still lets local governments make wind-siting decisions, and allows those who disagree with them to appeal to the PSC and the courts.3
-Eau Claire Leader-Telegram

1 The WTA has registered in opposition in 2009. The WCA has remained neutral.
2 Maps adopted under s. 66.1001(2)(b) on or before June 1, 2009.


Make a Comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

One Response to “Wind siting reform and local control”

RSS Feed for Comments RSS Feed

Wind Siting Reform and Local Control

What would you think about the PSC having control of projects 50MW and larger and leaving control for smaller projects with the Towns?

I keep hearing 600MW of stalled wind power. Please identify the projects that make up the 600MW. I have looked but can’t come up to that number.

AB 256 and SB185 require an advisory committee but the committee has no teeth. Unless language is put in the bill to require the PSC to follow the recommendations of the advisory committee it’s just more smoke and mirrors.

Under the bill local government could never impose a restriction greater than what will be approved by the PSC. I don’t call that local control.

The task of enforcing permit standards imposed by the PSC will quickly outdistance the ability and resources of any local government. The PSC has the big stick in this situation and must enforce what they permit.

If the PSC has approved a project any appeal to them is pointless. Any appeal should go to an arbitration board of some kind independent of the PSC. A court challenge sounds good but expensive. All costs of appeal and court action would be paid by the wind developer.

Noise at night is the biggest problem with wind turbines. Developers continue to expect preferential treatment and deny that turbines make any noise. Other noise makers are forced to accept noise regulations, quarries and pits have hours and days of operation. Cities and Towns post signs NO JAKE BRAKES. In Madison the trains do not blow their whistles. Why, because the nighttime hours when people sleep need to by quiet and protected.

Where's The Comment Form?


    A statewide nonprofit dedicated to promoting economically and environmentally sustainable energy policies and practices in Wisconsin.


    Subscribe Via RSS

    • Subscribe with Bloglines
    • Add your feed to Newsburst from CNET
    • Subscribe in Google Reader
    • Add to My Yahoo!
    • Subscribe in NewsGator Online
    • The latest comments to all posts in RSS


Liked it here?
Why not try sites on the blogroll...

%d bloggers like this: